Straight Talk about South Carolina Divorce Law | Robert N. Rosen

Straight Talk about South Carolina Divorce Law is a clear and detailed guide to how divorce and family law cases are actually handled and resolved in South Carolina. It is a practical and realistic overview of how lawyers, experts, and mediators operate, and how Family Court judges decide what happens in divorce, custody, and matrimonial cases.

It includes descriptions-written in layman's language-of the laws governing divorce, key points to consider for anyone involved in a matrimonial dispute in South Carolina, and essential information for people getting divorced or those involved in custody, separation, or marital litigation.

• Arnal v. Arnal, 609 S.E.2d 821 (2005)
• Bakala v. Bakala, 576 S.E.2d 156 (2003)
• Berry v. Berry, 364 S.E.2d 463 (1988)
• Brooks v. Brooks, 345 S.E.2d 510 (Ct. App. 1986)
• Brown v. Brown, 56 S.E.2d 330 (1949)
• Brown v. Brown, 156 S.E.2d 641 (1967)
• Bungener v. Bungener, 357 S.E.2d 147 (Ct. App. 1987)
• Camburn v. Smith, 586 S.E.2d 656 (2003)
• Canady v. Canady, 374 S.E.2d 502 (Ct. App. 1988)
• Casey v. Casey, 362 S.E.2d 6 (1987)
• Clear v. Clear, 500 S.E. 2d 790 (Ct. App. 1998)
• Crim v. Crim, 345 S.E.2d 515 (Ct. App. 1986)
• Davenport v. Davenport, 220 S.E.2d 228 (1975)
• Hardee v. Hardee, 585 S.E.2d 501 (2003)
• Patel v. Patel, 555 S.E.2d 386 (2001)
• Pirayesh v. Pirayesh, 596 S.E.2d 505 (Ct. App. 2004)
• Doe v. Doe, 334 S.E.2d 829 (Ct. App. 1985)
• Doe v. Doe, 478 S.E.2d 854 (Ct. App. 1996)
• Donahue v. Donahue, 384 S.E.2d 741 (1989)
• DuBose v. DuBose, 192 S.E.2d 329 (1972)
• E.D.M. v. T.A.M., 307, 415 S.E.2d 812 (1992)
• Ford v. Ford, 130 S.E.2d 916 (1963)
• Frank v. Frank, 429 S.E.2d 823 (Ct.App. 1993)
• Gill v. Gill, 237 S.E.2d 382 (1997)
• Griffith v. Griffith, 645, 506 S.E.2d 526 (Ct. App. 1998)
• Guinan v. Guinan,176 S.E.2d 173 (1970)
• Hendricks v. Hendricks, 330 S.E.2d 553 (Ct. App. 1985)
• Johns v. Johns, 420 S.E.2d 856 (Ct. App. 1992)
• Johnson v. Johnson, 372 S.E.2d 107 (Ct. App. 1988), cert. denied 298 S.C. 117, 378 S.E.2d 445 (1989)
• Jones v. Jones, 241 S.E.2d 904 (1978)
• Jones v. Jones, 314 S.E.2d 33 (Ct. App. 1984)
• Josey v. Josey, 351 S.E.2d 891 (Ct. App. 1986)
• Kelly v. Kelly, 477 S.E.2d 727 (Ct. App. 1996)
• Latimer v. Farmer, 602 S.E.2d 32 (2004)
• Levin v. Levin, 68 S.C. 123 (1903)
• Mallet v Mallet, 473 S.E.2d 804 (1996)
• McElveen v. McElveen, 506 S.E.2d 1 (Ct. App., 1998)
• McKenzie v. McKenzie, 175 S.E. 2d 628 (1970)
• Mixson v. Mixson, 171 S.E.2d 581 (1969)
• Moseley v. Mosier, 306 S.E. 2d 624 (1983)
• Murphy v. Murphy, 461, S.E.2d 39 (1995)
• O'Neil v. O'Neil, 359 S.E.2d 68 (Ct. App., 1987)
• Panhorst v. Panhorst, 390 S.E.2d 376 (Ct. App. 1989)
• Paparella v. Paparella, 531 S.E.2d 297 (Ct. App. 2000)
• Parris v. Parris, 460 S.E.2d 571 (1995)
• Peterkin v. Peterkin, 360 S.E.2d 311 (1987)
• Phipps v. Phipps, 57 S.E.2d 417 (1950)
• Pirri v. Pirri, 631 S.E.2d 279 (Ct. App., 2006)
• Poliakoff v. Poliakoff, 70 S.E.2d 625 (1952)
• Pountain v. Pountain, 503 S.E.2d 757 (1998)
• Prevatte v. Prevatte, S.E.2d 114 (Ct. App. 1989)
• Ray v. Ray, 296 S.C. 350, 372 S.E.2d 910 (Ct. App. 1988)
• Sexton v. Sexton, 416 S.E.2d 649 (Ct. App. 1992)
• Sharpe v. Sharpe, 416 S.E.2d 215 (Ct. App. 1992)
• Stroman v. Williams, 353 S.E. 2d 704 (1987)
• Taylor v. Taylor, 508 S.E. 2d 50 (Ct. App. 1980)
• The Husband v. The Wife, 392 S.E.2d 811 (Ct. App. 1990)
• Towles v. Towles, 182 S.E.2d 53 (1971)
• Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000)
• Woodside v. Woodside, 350 S.E.2d 407 (Ct. App. 1986)
• Woodside v. Woodside, 471 S.E.2d 154 (1996)
• Case Law Listings - PDF